There are four situations in which these questions prove particularly useful:
When transitioning to agile from a strong command and control environment, many team members say as little as possible in Retrospectives. They are used to being told what to do, and do not want to seem like the ‘trouble maker’ by pointing out obvious issues. The prompting questions help them to find something that the feel comfortable providing input on. The more often they provide input in retrospectives and don’t get in trouble for it, the more useful information they will provide in the future.
One: Team transforming from command and control culture
Teams that haven’t done retrospectives in the past often don’t understand the scope of what can be discussed. To aid the explanation of scope and to help bring out information from quiet team members the following list of questions is often useful.
Two: Team is new to retrospectives
Again for teams transitioning from a command and control culture the scope of what they could change in the past was very limited. This compounds their reluctance to speak up.
Three: Retrospectives stagnating; due to repetitionFor teams that have done many retrospectives; there can come a time where they run out of things to discuss. The prompting questions help them to broaden their view and finds topics worth discussing as a team.
Four: Scrum MastersFor the Scrum Master it will be worth reading these questions prior to each Retrospective and working out which questions could be used to prompt discussion within the team.
Retrospective Prompting Questions
- Is our team delivering as fast as possible? If not, why not?
- Why did the extra tasks appear in the sprint?
- Why were User Stories/Tasks not completed?
- Why were some User Stories/Tasks, only partially completed?
- Did the team over commit?
- Was the team reliant on one person/skill set to complete a task?
- Were any milestones missed?
- Were last Sprint Retrospective actions items completed?
- Where our estimates accurate? Both Story Points and hours?
- What was the quality of our deliverables appropriate?
- Did the Review/Demonstration make you proud to be a member of this team?
- Was the test coverage (both automated and manual) sufficient for our needs?
- Did our documentation provide the information that we required to complete our jobs?
- Did rework hold us back this sprint?
- What was the cause of the bugs/tickets that we worked on this sprint?
- It has now been X sprints that we have been using Scrum, do we think our situation is better or worse since starting? What is better? What is worse?
- What did everyone work on immediately after the Planning meeting? Why did people work on items other then high priority User Stories?
- Why were low priority tasks being worked on, while high priority user stories were on hold?
- Was the Product Backlog ready for use at the planning session? Prioritised, estimated, enough detail?
- Did the Burn-down Chart realistically represent the progress of the team?
- Did everyone view the Burn-down chart as useful?
- How did everyone contribute to User Story value?
- Is everyone happy with how the Stand ups are working? Can they be improved?
- Is everyone happy with how the Reviews are working? Can they be improved?
- Is everyone happy with how the Retrospectives are working? Can they be improved?
- Were the actions created from our last Retrospective completed?
- Were the actions created from our last Retrospective beneficial?
Communication and Team work
- Did anyone in the team do outstanding work that should be acknowledged?
- Did team members just at the chance to help each other?
- Did anyone have difficulties obtaining timely information/assistance from people in the team? I.e. Architect, Test Specialist, Documentation Specialist, Scrum Master, etc.
- Did anyone have difficulties obtaining timely information/assistance from people outside of the team? I.e. Product Owner, external Technical Expert.
- How is the morale of the team?
- Was everyone clear on the team goals?
- Was everyone clear on their personal priorities?
- Did internal knowledge transfer occur in a timely and effective manner?
- How was the team internal communication? Was it clear, concise and timely?
- How was the intra-team communication? Were expectations and dependencies clear?
To my blog readers
- What questions would you add to this list?
- Are there questions you would remove, or change?